Admin Criteria

Criteria for Rating Administration

A comprehensive job description must be provided (preferably an agreement between the Department Chairperson and the faculty member).

Criteria marked with a * represent expectations for persons seeking reappointment, tenure, and promotion.

Numeric
Value

Guidelines for evaluating productivity

+,0,-

Administrative involvement matches administration load

Numeric
Value

Guidelines for evaluating productivity

No job description is provided

1-7

	Responsibilities specified in the job description are fulfilled
	Initiated activities beyond the job description designed to improve department operations
	Obtained faculty and/or student input about decisions and/or policies in area of jurisdiction
	Formative and/or summative evaluations of performance were positive

Numeric
Value

Guidelines for evaluating productivity

No evidence of professional growth is provided

Evidence of professional growth is provided

2-4

	Papers have been accepted or presented at professional meetings
	Papers, chapters, or books have been submitted for publication
	Papers, chapters, or books have been accepted or published by lesser journals/publication firms
	Papers or monographs are publicly available as internal publications

4-7

	Papers have been accepted or published by major refereed professional journals
	Chapters have been refereed and appear in books that have been accepted or published by major publishing firms
	Books have been accepted or published by major publishing firms

Numeric
Value

Guidelines for evaluating productivity

Bonus

Awards for administrative service*